A) contract
B) non-negotiable instrument
C) negotiable instrument
D) endorsing document
E) application
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes.
B) No, although Garren met the requirements for presentment and Dexter refused to pay, he did not explicitly dishonor the note.
C) No, Garren only told Dexter about the promissory note and never exhibited the promissory note to Dexter, therefore there was no presentment and Dexter did not dishonor the note.
D) No, Garren did not present the note in a timely manner, therefore Dexter did not dishonor the note.
E) No, Garren was not a proper party, therefore Dexter did not dishonor the note.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, because the notice does not identify the instrument in question.
B) No, unless Garren specifically states that he is dishonoring the note.
C) No, because Garren did not sign his name.
D) No, because simply writing "dishonor" is insufficient to constitute notice.
E) Yes, because if the word "dishonor" on the instrument is sufficient to constitute notice.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) an agent
B) a principal
C) an endorser
D) a proprietary
E) an authorizer
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) maker
B) acceptor
C) drawer
D) endorser
E) promisor
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The only requirement is that the holder of the instrument present the instrument to the drawer in a proper and timely fashion.
B) The only requirement is that the holder of the instrument present the instrument to the drawee in a proper and timely fashion.
C) The two requirements are that (1) the holder of the instrument present the instrument to the drawer in a proper and timely fashion and (2) the holder establish that the check was wrongfully dishonored.
D) The three requirements are that (1) the holder of the instrument present the instrument to the drawee in a proper and timely fashion, (2) the instrument be dishonored, and (3) notice of the dishonor be given to the drawer.
E) The four requirements are that (1) the holder of the instrument present the instrument to the drawee in a proper and timely fashion, (2) the instrument be dishonored, (3) notice of the dishonor be given to the drawer, and (4) proof provided by the holder that the check was wrongfully dishonored.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Chloe
B) The Furniture Shop
C) Chloe's bank
D) Rabia's bank
E) There is no holder in this instance
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Infancy (being below the legal age of consent) , to the extent that it makes a contract void
B) Discharge through insolvency proceedings (bankruptcy)
C) Forgery
D) Impairment of collateral
E) Fraud in the factum
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) maker
B) acceptor
C) drawer
D) endorser
E) endorsee
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) actuary
B) accommodation
C) agent
D) principle
E) endorsee
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) It is likely that Chloe will have to pay the check as a secondarily liable party.
B) It is unlikely that Chloe will have to pay on the check because the UCC states that a check must be presented within 60 days in order to hold a drawer secondarily liable.
C) It is unlikely that Chloe will have to pay on the check because the UCC states that a check must be presented within 30 days in order to hold a drawer secondarily liable.
D) It is unlikely that Chloe will have to pay on the check because the UCC states that a check must be presented within 20 days in order to hold a drawer secondarily liable.
E) It is unlikely that Chloe will have to pay on the check because the UCC states that a check must be presented within 10 days in order to hold a drawer secondarily liable.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) No, because Prida's name must appear on the note in order to be held liable.
B) No, because Charla intended to quit her job at Prida's.
C) No, because Charla did not write "as an agent of Prida's" on the note.
D) Yes, because Jirah knew that Charla worked for Prida's.
E) Yes, if Charla signed the note truly on behalf of Prida's, then Prida's can be held liable even if not identified on the note.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) That the defending bank had no right to return the check because the check had already gone through the Federal Reserve System.
B) That the defending bank had no right to return the check because by accepting the check, it became accountable for it.
C) That the bank had no right to return the check because the check was written by one of its customers.
D) That the defending bank had until midnight on April 10 to return the check and that it, therefore, did not act in a timely manner.
E) That the defending bank had until midnight on April 11 to return the check and that it, therefore, acted in a timely manner in doing so.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) As a matter of law, the presenting bank is charged with notice of forgeries; therefore, XYZ must take the loss, and Liam is entitled to a return of his funds.
B) Lara, the payee, bore a risk of loss and, although Liam is not entitled to return of the funds, his debt to Lara is discharged.
C) Liam is entitled to a return of only ½ of the funds because in such cases, the collecting bank, XYZ Bank, and the drawer, Liam, must share the loss.
D) Liam is entitled to a return of the funds only if he can establish that he notified ABC Bank of the problem within 30 days of receiving the bank statement showing the alteration.
E) Liam is entitled to a refund if he can establish that XYZ Bank failed to exercise ordinary care in taking the instrument.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Yes, because she has not been discharged.
B) Yes, she is primarily liable on the note, but the other endorsers were discharged.
C) Yes, because Felicia must mutilate the note to show that Felicia is discharged from liability.
D) No, because the note became void once it was reacquired by Felicia.
E) No, since Tonya surrendered the note to Felicia, Felicia is no longer liable on the note.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Chloe
B) The Furniture Shop
C) Rabia, as primary owner of The Furniture Shop
D) Chloe's bank.
E) Rabia's bank.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) Because of the fraudulent alteration, Zoe is not liable to Rohan for any amounts under the promissory note.
B) Zoe's obligation will be enforced only to the amount of $4,000 if payment is to be made to Rohan; but if the note has been negotiated to another holder, Zoe is liable for $4,500.
C) Taylor's obligation will be enforced only to the amount of $3,000 if payment is to be made to Rohan; but in the event the note is negotiated to a holder in due course, Taylor is liable for $3,500.
D) Unless Zoe has a written document from Rohan to the effect that the agreement was for $4,000 only, Zoe and Rohan will be legally required to split the remainder with Zoe being held responsible for $4,250.
E) Zoe is liable for $4,000 regardless of whether or not Rohan has negotiated the note to another party.
Correct Answer
verified
Multiple Choice
A) The note has never been dishonored because Floyd's right to receive payment on the note from someone is acknowledged.
B) Hema initially dishonored the instrument when she asked for proper identification.
C) Hema initially dishonored the instrument when she refused to pay it on the basis that she lacked funds with which to do so.
D) The note was not dishonored until Anne told Floyd that he would have to seek recovery from Rahul.
E) The note was considered initially dishonored 30 days after Floyd started seeking Rahul, but was unable to find him.
Correct Answer
verified
True/False
Correct Answer
verified
Showing 41 - 60 of 90
Related Exams